<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[&#8220;The Perpetual Utterance Of Self-Applause,&#8221; Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Ponnuru and Lowry <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2010/03/09/american-exceptionalism-revisited/">respond</a> to the many critics of their <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/02/the-perpetual-utterance-of-selfapplause.html">essay</a> on American exceptionalism. Samuel Goldman <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/postmodernconservative/2010/03/09/american-exceptionalism-revisited/">interjects</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Ponnuru and Lowry admit that Obama has explicitly acknowledged America’s exceptional principles and role. But they dismiss this with the observation that it&#0160; “would be remarkable if any president did not say such things.” Which is true enough. But in that case, the argument becomes trivially psychologizing: Obama SAYS he believes in American exceptionalism, but he doesn’t really MEAN it.&#0160; As far as I can tell, Ponnuru and Lowry present no evidence for that conclusion except some quotes in which Obama suggests that the election of a black man, namely himself, to the presidency was sort of a big deal.&#0160; I guess that can be seen as narcissistic.&#0160; But I seem to recall a similar sentiment expressed in the pages of NR and Commentary back in November.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>