<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Free Association While&nbsp;High]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Jonah Lehrer <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/2010/03/marijuana_and_divergent_thinki.php">responds</a> to <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/03/a-mood-to-fit-the-problem.html">this post</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A new <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20122742">paper</a> published in Psychiatry Research sheds some light on this phenomenon, or why smoking weed seems to unleash a stream of loose associations. The study looked at a phenomenon called semantic priming, in which the activation of one word allows us to react more quickly to related words. For instance, the word &quot;dog&quot; might lead to decreased reaction times for &quot;wolf,&quot; &quot;pet&quot; and &quot;Lassie,&quot; but won&#39;t alter how quickly we react to &quot;chair&quot;.  Interestingly, marijuana seems to induce a state of hyper-priming, in which the reach of semantic priming extends outwards to distantly related concepts. As a result, we hear &quot;dog&quot; and think of nouns that, in more sober circumstances, would seem to have nothing in common.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He warns that &quot;you don&#39;t want too much hyper-priming, or else everything seems connected; the web of associations becomes a source of delusions.&quot; Vaughan Bell <a href="http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2010/03/how_cannabis_makes_t.html">has more</a> along those lines.</p>
]]></html></oembed>