<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Indispensability of Practical&nbsp;Wisdom]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Bernstein <a href="http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/saletan-and-representation.html">rebuts</a> William Saletan&#39;s <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/03/pass-1.html">latest column</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Yes, the Constitution does create a system of representative democracy, not direct democracy.&#0160; But how are those representatives supposed to decide? &#0160; The Constitution is silent about that.&#0160; We can suppose (and here I&#39;m following <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Concept-Representation-Hanna-F-Pitkin/dp/0520021568">Hanna Pitkin</a>) that Saletan is correct at one extreme; if Members simply take a poll about everything and do whatever the poll tells them, then they&#39;re not really &quot;representing&quot; them.&#0160; But, Pitkin argues, the other extreme -- in which the elected official does whatever she wants, regardless of what the people say they want -- isn&#39;t really &quot;representation&quot; either.&#0160; For her, representation is a way of making present someone (the constituents) who aren&#39;t actually present.&#0160; And so they have to be with the politician, in some sense, but not completely overwhelming him.</p></blockquote><p>Bernstein&#39;s <a href="http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/2010/03/hey-pols-its-ok-to-want-re-election.html">second criticism</a>:]]></html></oembed>