<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[$1.50 A Day,&nbsp;Please]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s how much Rupert Murdoch is planning to ask online readers to pay to read the Times and the Sunday Times of London. <a href="http://www.hydrapinion.com/index.php/work/2010/03/29/4-reasons-why-the-great-paywall-of-murdoch-will-succeed">Ian Grayson</a> thinks it&#39;s genius. Jeff Jarvis <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/26/rupert-murdoch-pathetic-paywall">less so:</a></p><blockquote><p>Murdoch will milk his cash cow a pound at a time, leaving his  children with a dry, dead beast, the remains of his once proud if not  great newspaper empire. I used to work for Murdoch at his  American magazine TV Guide. I respected his balls. It is a pity to see  them gone.</p></blockquote><p>Meanwhile, the WSJ <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100325/tc_afp/usmedianewspapersinternetnewscorpappleipad">announces</a> $18 a month to read it on an iPad. <a href="http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/430/rupert-murdoch-if-you-want-to-read-a-paper-read-the-damn-paper.html?utm_source=otg&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=20100329">Michael Wolff,</a> as usual, puts the boot in:]]></html></oembed>