<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Funken, To Spark]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>An insight into the <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2010/04/blogs_and_radio">enduring appeal</a> of radio and blogs:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> All German terms for radio are derived from a single verb: <em>funken</em>, to spark. I&#39;ve been trying to understand the continued appeal of radio when there are so many different and more convenient ways to get news and music, and I think it has to do with the idea that we know, when we listen to the radio, that someone, somewhere is alive. <em>Es funkt.</em> There is a spark at the other end, a fire on the hilltop. </p>
<p>A blog, done right, provides this proof the same way radio does. You hear a voice, which means that someone is actually sitting in a booth somewhere talking down the signal to you. And if they take your calls, or read your emails, then they&#39;re listening, too. I think blogs and radio are more than the sum of the information or entertainment they provide; they&#39;re a source of human comfort. </p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>