<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Yglesias Award Nominee]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>&quot;Wow, I rarely find myself disagreeing with <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/05/whatever_happened_to_first_do.php" title="PZ">PZ</a>, <a href="http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2010/05/first-do-no-harm.html" title="Melissa">Melissa</a>, and <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/021093.html" title="Samhita">Samhita</a>, but I have to say that I don’t really see the problem with the <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/05/ritual-genital-cutting-of-female-minors-.html">American Academy of Pediatrics advising doctors</a> to offer a “ritual nick” <em>in lieu of</em> the more serious forms of female circumcision that are often on offer in some other parts of the world.&#0160; The practice is something that is done in modern places that want to have a link to tradition without actually doing any real harm to little girls, from what I understand.&#0160; All they do is prick your genitals, or make a small cut that heals over, but nothing is removed.&#0160; You’re basically scratching the girl.&#0160; It’s not <em>awesome</em>&#8212;and from what I understand, in some places they just wave the razor over the girl’s genitals but don’t touch her at all&#8212;but comparing it to more severe forms of female circumcision troubles me,&quot; &#8211; <a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/im_anti_tradition_but/#When:17:46:01Z">Amanda Marcotte</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>