<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Quote For The Day&nbsp;III]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>&quot;I can&#39;t believe how much they&#39;ve offered us. The Tories have basically rubbed out their manifesto and inserted ours. We&#39;ll have to cope for four or five years with our flesh creeping, but still,&quot; &#8211; a left-leaning Lib-Dem member of parliament to <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/michaelcrick/2010/05/all_the_momentum_now_towards_a.html">Michael Crick. </a></p>
<p>We&#39;ll find out soon enough. I should say I am not opposed to the referendum on AV or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting">instant run-off voting</a>. My concern is that Britain continues to have a one-member-one-constituency system, to ensure direct representation and avoid too much power going to party elites. Under AV, the Liberals would do much better &#8211; but Britain would also have a chance to retain strong, clear, one-party governments. </p>
<p>In some ways, too, this outcome allows Cameron to ditch the Tory right. I suspect there will be grumbling among the ranks, and that William Hague, the chief negotiator for Cameron, will once again be delegated to bring them on board.</p>
]]></html></oembed>