<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[BP&#8217;s Damage Control,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p> <img alt="BP-fail-whale" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e2013484b09489970c " src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/6a00d83451c45669e2013484b09489970c-550wi.jpg" style="width: 515px;" /> </p>
<p>First <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/bps-damage-control.html">newspapers</a>, then <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/06/bps-damage-control-ctd.html">Google searches</a>, now <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/agency/e3ie8547ace0ecf6e0778e4235e55b27bf8?pn=1">social networking sites</a>. <span class="authorname">Alex Seitz-Wald <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/21/bp-social-media/">isn&#39;t impressed</a>:</span> </p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8230; BP seems uninterested in the social aspect of social media. On Facebook, the company only accepts comments from people who “like” BP, while comments are disabled completely on the company’s YouTube channel</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(&quot;<a href="http://thedailywh.at/post/681697866/oskar-krawczyk-bp-fail-whale-fail-whale">BP fail whale</a>&quot; illustration by <a href="http://twitter.com/oskar/status/15791585260">Oskar Krawczyk</a>)</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/6a00d83451c45669e2013484b09489970c-550wi.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[439]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>