<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[How Fear Infects,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><em><span style="font-size: 12px;">by Patrick Appel</span></em></p>
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Something to <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/how-fear-infects.html">keep in mind</a> is that police officers are required to walk into and to participate in events from which the rest of us are entitled &#8211; and even advised &#8211; to shy away.</p>
<p>That fact, I think, is part of the reason why police officers are less likely to be convicted for shootings for which they would be punished if they were not police officers. I&#39;m not chasing after a guy identified by a bloodied victim as having raped her; I&#39;m not supposed to confront him, to physically subdue him and to take him into custody.</p>
<p>If I think a guy has a gun &#8211; just &quot;think&quot; he does &#8211; I can run away. But since I wasn&#39;t running after him in the first place I&#39;m not that likely to be present when he pulls out what I think is a gun. And I certainly don&#39;t have to keep going toward him so that I can capture and subdue him.</p>
<p>Police officers get a break on their decisions to use force because they have to actually make decisions; the rest of us don&#39;t.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>