<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What A Palin Endorsement Can Do,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Ambinder <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/07/post-palin-ergo-propter-palin/60497/">wants</a> more data:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Logically, one cannot connect any appreciable drop in Ayotte&#39;s numbers to one thing that happened so recently; this is the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. PPP covers themselves by modifiers, as in, &quot;Palin&#39;s endorsement may well be playing a role in this.&quot; Maybe. The poll suggests that most independents &#8212; those famous New Hampshire independents, that 50 percent of New Hampshire voters &#8212; are less willing to vote for a candidate who gets the support of Sarah Palin. That&#39;s an interesting data point, but it screams for more information: of Republican-leaning independents, how salient is this belief? And since PPP last polled in April, why isolate Palin&#39;s endorsement as the thing that has damaged Ayotte&#39;s standing among moderates? Nothing happened for three months, and suddenly Palin makes Ayotte a Mama Grizzly, and suddenly Ayotte&#39;s ratings drop? Eh. More information is needed. </p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>