<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[&#8230;Or Else The Terrorists Will&nbsp;Win]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Since September 11, 2001, that&#39;s been the justification for every new encroachment on civil liberties, and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_self">this time is scarcely different</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Essentially, officials want Congress to require all services that enable  communications — including encrypted e-mail transmitters like  BlackBerry, social networking Web sites like <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/facebook_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about Facebook.">Facebook</a> and software that allows direct “peer to peer” messaging like <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/skype_technologies_sa/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about Skype Technologies SA.">Skype</a> — to be technically capable of complying if served with a wiretap  order. The mandate would include being able to intercept and unscramble  encrypted messages.</p> </blockquote> <p>This logic would be a good basis for a science fiction story about the invention of telepathy, and the government&#39;s inevitable insistence that it needs to tap into our brains. Greenwald <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/27/privacy?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+salon%2Fgreenwald+%28Glenn+Greenwald%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">explains</a> why this news is more extreme than it first appears:</p>]]></html></oembed>