<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Tweaking Healthcare: Look Beyond&nbsp;Washington]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>The president has said he&#39;s open to it. The GOP is pretending to want to abolish all of it. But both may be irrelevant in the next two years, given a veto. Aaron Carroll <a href="http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/look-to-the-states/" target="_self">ignores</a> Congress and points to the states:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It’s important to remember that insurance is regulated to a large extent at the <a href="http://www.naic.org/state_web_map.htm">state level</a>.&#0160; Insurance commissioners are not appointed by the President or by Congress; they are appointed by governors.&#0160; And on Tuesday, Republicans <a href="http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/results/governor">picked up nine seats</a> to control 29 states. Moreover, the exchanges, which still have to be set up, are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/health/policy/24exchange.html">also state based</a>.&#0160; Again, state insurance commissioners will have a lot of power and control to set regulations on how the exchanges will work.&#0160; That will make a big difference in how reform functions in the individual insurance market – where most of the uninsured are expected to get insurance.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>