<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Getting Their Next War&nbsp;On]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/11/07/graham-iran-neuter/" target="_self">Butters</a> and <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101107/ts_nm/us_usa_israel" target="_self">Benjamin Netanyahu</a> are both itching for a new war on Iran - and, in Butters&#39; case, not just against their nuclear program but their entire conventional military, i.e. full-scale not just pre-emptive but punitive war on a regime the US government opposes. On what grounds in international law or just war theory, one wonders? Meanwhile, Larison <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2010/11/05/israelpalestine-and-iran-are-not-linked-and-should-not-be-linked-ii/" target="_self">thinks</a> I&#39;m wrong to <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/11/debating-israel-palestine-iii.html" target="_self">link</a> the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the Israel-Iran grudge match:</p>]]></html></oembed>