<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Make Us Thrifty, But Not&nbsp;Yet]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Yglesias <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/11/preemptive-fiscal-adjustment/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">comes out</a> as another liberal finding reasons not to tackle the long-term debt now:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The budget deficit isn’t currently a problem, but it almost certainly will be in the future and that’s when congress will act to deal with it [&#8230;]&#0160; It would be wise and just and moral for the 112th Congress to pass a  judicious long-term debt reduction program, but it doesn’t seem even  remotely realistic. Is there any precedent for a country doing deficit  reduction pre-emptively in the way everyone seems to be suggesting we  should?</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>