<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Being And Time]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Mark Vernon <a href="http://www.bigquestionsonline.com/columns/mark-vernon/watches-and-the-watchmaker" target="_self">writes</a> on the divine and the physics of time. Augustine saw God as definitionally changeless through time. That idea is now under attack:</p> <blockquote> <p>Polkinghorne borrows another notion, from process thought. In process  thought, change is not regarded with the suspicion that it is in the  Platonic thought of Augustine. Change might be for the better — as  evolution seems to imply, with its tendency to greater complexity and  the emergence of consciousness, and then the moral sensibilities of  self-consciousness. Surely, such change is a good thing. What this  implies, for Polkinghorne, is that God can’t know the future because the  future is not fully determined by the present. There is genuine novelty  in the universe.</p> <p>But where does that leave God?</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>