<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Cantor Pre-Empts Clinton,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>A reader writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that a reader <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/11/cantor-pre-empts-clinton-ctd-1.html" target="_self">brought up</a> Nancy Pelosi going to Syria as precedent for Eric Cantor&#8217;s trip, considering what he had to say about that specific matter <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/220559/assads-speaker/eric-cantor#" target="_self">over at the National Review</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Presenting Assad with &#8216;a new Democratic alternative&#8217; — code for making President Bush look feckless — Mrs. Pelosi usurped the executive branch’s time-honored foreign-policy authority. [&#8230;] Several leading legal authorities have made the case that her recent diplomatic overtures ran afoul of the Logan Act, which makes it a felony for any American &#8216;without authority of the United States&#8217; to communicate with a foreign government to influence that government’s behavior on any disputes with the United States.</p>
<p>So three years ago Cantor condemned and questioned the legality of Pelosi doing in Syria exactly what he just did with Israel.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cantor is the classic Beltway pol: if they do it, it&#8217;s treason; if I do it, it&#8217;s patriotism.</p>
]]></html></oembed>