<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Oxymoron Of A &#8220;Conservative Movement&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>E.D. Kain <a href="http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2010/11/american-exceptionalism-and-anti-historicism-on-the-right/" target="_self">explains</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I would suggest that perhaps the conservative movement itself is the  most sacred of sacred cows here, and also the greatest impediment to  conservatism as a ‘reality-based force in American politics’. More than  anything, it is the movement itself which creates these closed  information circuits, which revels in anti-historicism and the weaving  of conservative illusion. In some ways it is also a great political  force, but I also suspect that it is nearing its zenith in terms of both  heat and light.</p>
<p>These sorts of movements by their very natures have  poor immune systems which is why they guard themselves so fiercely, why  they are forced to create alternative narratives, alternate histories.  They are brittle. The conservative movement, for all its ferocity and  political savvy, is brittle, because it relies too heavily on its own  illusions – illusions which have been made in recent years all too  convincing by outlets like Fox News.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And when such reality-divorced movements collapse, they collapse very suddenly.</p>
]]></html></oembed>