<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[If Not A Mandate,&nbsp;What?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Howard Gleckman <a href="http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/2011/01/18/are-there-alternatives-to-the-individual-mandate-in-the-health-reform-law/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+taxpolicycenter%2Fblogfeed+%28TaxVox%3A+the+Tax+Policy+Center+blog%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">focuses</a> on the ACA&#39;s most unpopular provision &#8211; the healthcare mandate:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In some ways, the mandate represents the worst of all policy worlds. Americans hate it because they can’t stand the idea of being made to get coverage or pay a tax. On the other hand, the initial levy is so low—only $95-a-year—it isn’t much of an incentive to buy insurance. The penalty is supposed to gradually increase to as much as $695 or 2.5 percent of taxable income, but Congress could well bow to the inevitable pressure to block the –let’s all say it together– “job-killing health tax increase.”&#0160;&#0160;</p>
<p>In this environment, both pols and policy analysts are looking for more palatable—and possibly more effective– alternatives to the mandate. And there may be some.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He proceeds to list them.</p>
]]></html></oembed>