<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Political Dead Ends]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="GunControl" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e20147e1ebcf46970b" src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/6a00d83451c45669e20147e1ebcf46970b-550wi.gif" style="width: 515px;" title="GunControl" /> <br /><em></em></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 8pt;">by Patrick Appel</span></em></p>
<p>Beinart <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-01-24/why-obama-wont-call-for-gun-control-in-his-state-of-the-union-speech/" target="_self">says</a> that Obama won&#39;t touch gun control in the SOTU:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Unlike crime, which was a constant presence, continually reminding Americans of the absurdity of allowing dangerous people to buy high-tech weapons, episodes like the one in Tucson produce a temporary spike in support for gun control, which quickly recedes. According to a CNN-Gallup poll, 28 percent of Americans said the Giffords shooting made them more likely to support gun control. But according to Pew, there were similar spikes after Columbine and Virginia Tech, and they had no lasting effect.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(Photo: <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/145526/Gallup-Review-Public-Opinion-Context-Tucson-Shootings.aspx" target="_self">Gallup</a>)</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/6a00d83451c45669e20147e1ebcf46970b-550wi.gif?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>