<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Physics And Philosophy Of Falling&nbsp;Trees]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Jim Baggott <a href="http://blog.oup.com/2011/02/quantum/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+oupblog+%28OUPblog%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_self">explores</a> how quantum theory mirrors the question, &quot;If a tree falls in the forest, and there’s nobody around to hear, does it make a sound?&quot;:</p> <blockquote> <p>Philosophers have long argued that sound, colour, taste, smell and  touch are all secondary qualities which exist only in our minds. We have  no basis for our common-sense assumption that these secondary qualities  reflect or represent reality as it really is. So, if we interpret the  word ‘sound’ to mean a human experience rather than a physical  phenomenon, then when there is nobody around there is a sense in which  the falling tree makes no sound at all.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>