<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Obama&#8217;s Marriage Decision,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Misty Irons <a href="http://moremusingson.blogspot.com/2011/02/thoughts-on-doma.html" target="_self">notes</a> how weak the substantive case for Prop 8 was shown to be in the Walker trial and wonders if that pushed the president to his new position:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Even if someone else wants to step up and defend DOMA,  how do you avoid a repeat of the pro-Prop. 8 case? Where will you get  your witnesses? How will you argue the case? What will this do to  people&#39;s professional or political credibility? I think the Obama  administration must have realized all this and now they don&#39;t want  anything to with the case. And if that realization has hit the highest  level of our government, then that is significant indeed. It should only  be a matter of time before the repercussions pervade throughout the  moral fabric of this country in the coming decade.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>