<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Waxing And Waning Of The&nbsp;Blogs]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Scott Rosenberg <a href="http://www.wordyard.com/2011/02/21/another-misleading-story-reports-that-blogs-r-dead/" target="_self">corrects</a> the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/21/technology/internet/21blog.html?_r=1" target="_self">New York Times</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Social networking <em>is</em> changing blogging. ...More of us are using Facebook and Twitter for  casual sharing and personal updates. That has helped clarify the place  of blogging as the medium for personal writing of a more substantial  nature. Keeping a blog <em>is</em> more work than posting to Facebook and  Twitter. So I wouldn’t be surprised if, long-term, the percentage of the  population blogging plateaus or even declines.</p> <p>Maybe we’ll end up with roughly ten percent of the online population  (Pew’s consistent finding) keeping a blog. As the online population  becomes closer to universal, that is an extraordinary thing: One in ten  people writing in public. Our civilization has never seen anything like  it.</p> <p>So you can keep your “waning” headlines, and I’ll keep my amazement and enthusiasm.</p> </blockquote> <p>Scott Esposito <a href="http://conversationalreading.com/nyt-continues-to-misunderstand-blogging?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ConversationalReading+%28Conversational+Reading%29" target="_self">piggybacks</a> on his argument. I&#39;ve stayed off Facebook for obvious reasons.</p>]]></html></oembed>