<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Wasteful Giving]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Felix Salmon is <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/14/dont-donate-money-to-japan/" target="_self">against</a> donating money to Japan:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We <a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2010/01/15/dont-give-money-to-haiti/" target="_blank">went through this</a> after the Haiti earthquake, and all of the arguments which applied  there apply to Japan as well. Earmarking funds is a really good way of  hobbling relief organizations and ensuring that they have to leave large  piles of money unspent in one place while facing urgent needs in other  places. And as Matthew Bishop and Michael Green <a href="http://www.philanthrocapitalism.net/2010/01/philanthrocapitalism-and-the-heart-strings/" target="_blank">said</a> last year, we are all better at responding to human suffering caused by  dramatic, telegenic emergencies than to the much greater loss of life  from ongoing hunger, disease and conflict. That often results in a mess  of uncoordinated NGOs parachuting in to emergency areas with lots of  good intentions, where a strategic official sector response would be  much more effective. Meanwhile, the smaller and less visible emergencies  where NGOs can do the most good are left unfunded.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>