<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Palin Wars: Talk Radio vs The Washington&nbsp;Right]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a fight between talk radio right and the Washington punditariat. On one side, we have Will, Krauthammer, Frum, Wehner. On the other, we have <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2011/03/rush-on-palin-and-krauthammer-and-brooks.html" target="_self">Rush</a> and now Levin. On his Facebook page, Levin has <a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-levin/the-hate-for-sarah-palin/10150105931685946" target="_self">posted</a> a lengthy defense of Sarah Palin that includes the favorite trick of noting that Ronald Reagan was also widely criticized before he ran for president:</p> <blockquote> <p>As a Reaganite pre-dating&#0160;Reagan&#39;s 1976 candidacy, the contempt for  Palin does, in fact, remind me of the contempt some had for Reagan,  especially from the media and&#0160;Republican establishment, although no  comparison is exact.&#0160;</p> </blockquote> <p>It&#39;s the high-water mark of absurd Reagan nostalgia: <em>the way people criticize you reminds me of how different people criticized him more than 30 years ago. Ergo, you must be worth defending! </em>Even more shoddy than the logic is the absurdity of a self-described foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution eliding the manifold differences between that president and the failed vice-presidential candidate from Alaska. As <a href="http://federalistpaupers.com/index.php/2011/03/14/defending-palin/" target="_self">noted</a> by Jaime at Federalist Paupers, Reagan gave this speech in 1964:</p>]]></html></oembed>