<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Who Would Give Up A SWAT&nbsp;Team?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>A reader writes:</p> <blockquote> <p>Surely <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2011/03/rhetoric-kills.html" target="_self">rhetoric</a> plays a role in the way drug arrests are carried out, but there&#39;s another reason. During the hysteria over the crack epidemic in the 1980s, more and more money flooded police forces to create SWAT teams. This wasn&#39;t just in the big cities dealing with what was a really big problem. In small cities and towns across the country, police departments created elite militarized forces.</p> <p>My first newspaper job was in a small town in Colorado in the late &#39;90s that was as far from the problem as you could imagine. They had a SWAT team there, and rather than draw it down once everyone realized crack would never be a problem there, the police started deploying it for pot busts, domestic abuse cases - basically anything more than a traffic stop.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>