<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Lying About Likes]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="Facebooklike" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e20147e3d5f666970b" src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/6a00d83451c45669e20147e3d5f666970b-550wi.png" style="width: 515px;" title="Facebooklike" /></p>
<p>Kevin Sablan <a href="http://almightylink.ksablan.com/statistics/facebook-like-count-39-accurate/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=tweet&amp;utm_campaign=facebooklike39accurate" target="_self">crunches</a>&#0160;some Facebook numbers:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The number of “likes” usually displayed alongside the Facebook like button is really an&#0160;<a href="http://almightylink.ksablan.com/statistics/facebook-button-count-is-wrong-use-realshare/" title="Facebook button count is wrong, use RealShare">aggregate of shares, likes and comments</a>. This morning, I took an arbitrary mix of Facebook related stories and found that the actual number of likes only accounted for a 39% of the number displayed.&#0160;This is by no means scientific, but I think it’s noteworthy.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Because news sites are publishing factual inaccuracies in articles that say things like “100 people recommend this” when in fact only 39 people did.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Party pooper.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/6a00d83451c45669e20147e3d5f666970b-550wi.png?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[272]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>