<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A &#8220;Rigorous&#8221; Theology,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<img class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e201538e22d8f1970b" style="width: 515px;" title="Fac2Fig1" src="http://andrewsullivan.readymadeweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/6a00d83451c45669e201538e22d8f1970b-550wi.jpg" alt="Fac2Fig1" /> A reader writes: In your <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/04/a-rigorous-theology.html" target="_self">response</a> to David Brooks' review of The Book of Mormon musical, you characterize the literal doctrines of Mormonism as "manifestly untrue," but I don't understand how by the same standards you apply to Mormonism, the doctrines of mainline Christianity and Catholicism are not also obviously false. Yes, you disavow certain doctrinal ideas that have been scientifically disproved or make no literal sense (such as The Garden of Eden or a 6000 year old Earth), but I don't think I understand what that leaves you with.]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/6a00d83451c45669e201538e22d8f1970b-550wi.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[360]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[240]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>