<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Mixing Up &#8220;Osama&#8221; And &#8220;Obama&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Enhanced-buzz-4343-1304444393-3" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e2014e88486a14970d" src="http://andrewsullivan.readymadeweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/6a00d83451c45669e2014e88486a14970d-550wi.jpg" style="width: 515px;" title="Enhanced-buzz-4343-1304444393-3" /></p> <p>Rebecca Greenfield <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/life/archive/2011/05/why-we-mix-up-osama-and-obama-a-linguistic-reason/238433/" target="_self">spoke to</a> linguist Mark Liberman about why the verbal gaffe is so common:</p> <blockquote> <p>The syntactic category rule means that when two words are confused for  one another the &quot;target&quot; (the word replaced) and the substituting word  are almost always of the same syntactic category. In normal speak: nouns  replace nouns, verbs replace verbs, and so on. If &quot;Obama&quot; were a verb  instead of a noun (as in, the Democrats are going to Obama the GOP in  2012), we would be substantially less likely to confuse it with the noun  &quot;Osama.&quot;</p> </blockquote>]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/6a00d83451c45669e2014e88486a14970d-550wi.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[278]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>