<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Big Lie: Torture Got Bin Laden,&nbsp;Ctd]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Marc Thiessen <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/cia-deniers-are-the-new-birthers/2011/05/09/AFFJiIZG_story.html" target="_self">claims</a> I&#39;m twisting the truth and then proceeds to paper over the difference between CIA interrogations and CIA interrogations <em>involving torture</em>. This is not a minor distinction. It is the entire distinction. Marcy Wheeler <a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/05/09/marc-thiessen-you-are-my-pinata/" target="_self">fisks</a> him. Much of the Thiessen column just avoids any discussion of how torture helped us get bin Laden, as well it might. But here&#39;s Marcy&#39;s <a href="http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2011/05/09/marc-thiessen-you-are-my-pinata/" target="_self">dismemberment</a> of the non-argument:</p> <blockquote> <p>So to summarize Thiessen’s spin of how al-Libi helped nab OBL:</p> <blockquote> <p>Al-Libi told the CIA that at a time when he was a key messenger for OBL, he had been in Abottabad</p> <p>Al-Libi told the CIA how important couriers were</p> <p>Al-Libi managed to hide the name of the all-important courier through whom we eventually found OBL, even under torture</p> </blockquote> <p>Okay, Marc, so what did the CIA do with that intelligence? As Jose  Rodriguez (who was head of Clandestine Services at the time) helpfully <a href="http://swampland.time.com/2011/05/04/did-torture-get-the-us-osama-bin-laden/">explained</a>, they concluded from al-Libi’s interrogation that OBL was just a figurehead.</p> <p>Al-Libbi told interrogators that the  courier would carry messages from   bin Laden to the outside world only  every two months or so. “I realized   that bin Laden was not really  running his organization. You can’t run  an  organization and have a  courier who makes the rounds every two  months,”  Rodriguez says. “So I  became convinced then that this was a  person who  was just a figurehead  and was not calling the shots, the  tactical shots,  of the  organization. So that was significant.”</p> <p>And later that same year, the CIA <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/washington/04intel.html">shut down</a> its dedicated hunt for OBL.</p> </blockquote> <p>So the torture of Al-Libi led to the Bush administration&#39;s <em>abandonment</em> of the hunt for bin Laden, a grotesque abdication of responsibility which president Obama rectified as soon as he became president. Why? because tortured information is often misleading - and led us <em>away from</em> finding OBL. The only other cases of torture in searching for bin Laden produced admitted <em>lies</em> about his couriers. And the use of torture, far from disabling terrorists, has, according to those in the front line, been the biggest source of Jihadist recruitment. Here&#39;s Will Wilkinson&#39;s <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/05/torture_and_osama_bin_laden" target="_self">perspective</a> on the bizarre re-ignition of the torture debate in the wake of Obama&#39;s triumph:</p>]]></html></oembed>