<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Science And The&nbsp;Rapture]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KBevUZE0TNw" width="515"></iframe></p> <p>Adam Frank <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2011/05/23/136553989/time-duration-and-prediction-some-thoughts-after-armageddon?ft=1&amp;f=114424647" target="_self">connects</a> the two:</p> <blockquote> <p>The ability to successfully predict the behavior of the natural world  is one reason we accord science such high status.  From predicting the  date of eclipses to anticipating the trajectory of a disease, science  does what no other field of human activity has managed — it gives us a  window into time.  It allows us to see though time and through the  duration we must endure to gain some measured certainty on the  succession of future events. Harold  Camping thought he had access to the same capacities.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>