<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Art: Best In&nbsp;Combination]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Alyssa Rosenberg <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2011/06/07/237982/we-have-our-arts-so-we-wont-die-of-truth-in-favor-of-political-art/" target="_self">adds</a> a final word to Megan&#39;s <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/06/against-art-in-politics-and-politics-in-art/239985/" target="_self">exploration</a> of bad politics in fiction:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Art takes us to the places we can’t go. Sometimes it  lies about what we’d find there, sometimes it misunderstands what it’s  trying to see through the wavery glass of prison doors and tank windows.  This is why it’s bad to read just one book, to read<em> Gone With the Wind</em> or Atlas Shrugged, or watch <em>Birth of a Nation</em> or <em>Battleship Potemkin</em> and nothing else. But it’s useful to read <em>Gone With the Wind</em> next to <em>Uncle Tom’s Cabin</em>:  knowing that Confederate nostalgia is wrong, and racist, doesn’t  obliterate the need to understand that people feel it, and are strongly  influenced by those feelings. Resolving the moral conundrum is  ultimately our work, not any one author of any one work’s, and it  doesn’t make sense to fault fiction for that.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>