<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[One Year After Financial Reform, And&nbsp;&#8230;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Mike Konczal is interviewing a series of experts about the Dodd-Frank law, and there&#39;s little agreement on what happened.&#0160; Marcus Stanley <a href="http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/marcus-stanley-of-americans-for-financial-reform-on-the-one-year-anniversary-of-dodd-frank/" target="_self">thinks</a> it&#39;s been working:</p> <blockquote> <p>Progress is being made. We can all make a list of things we believe  should have been in Dodd-Frank and weren’t. But there are important  pieces that are there. Among the two most significant are the new  Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the new framework for  derivatives regulation. Both of those efforts have made solid progress  over the past year in the face of heavy opposition. The goal of that  opposition is to erode the clear gains we did make in Dodd-Frank.</p> </blockquote> <p>Rob Johnson is <a href="http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/rob-johnson-on-the-one-year-anniversary-of-dodd-frank/" target="_self">pessimistic</a>:</p>]]></html></oembed>