<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The End Of The Terror&nbsp;War]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>As the intelligence community <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/al-qaeda-could-collapse-us-officials-say/2011/07/21/gIQAFu2pbI_story_1.html" target="_self">celebrates</a> al-Qaeda&#39;s near-defeat, Ackerman <a href="http://spencerackerman.typepad.com/attackerman/2011/07/victory-against-al-qaida-is-a-choice.html" target="_self">argues</a> that moving from &quot;near&quot; to &quot;total&quot; is simply a matter of how we think about it:</p> <blockquote> <p>Victory against al-Qaida isn&#39;t just a battlefield circumstance, an  argument won in Tahrir Square or a missile aimed at an al-Shabaab  commander. It&#39;s a conscious strategic decision taken by politicians to  say: <em>the costs of this campaign are vastly out of proportion to the  actual threat posed by al-Qaida, and so it is time to drive those costs  down into something proportional.</em></p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>