<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Mancession Replaced With&nbsp;Hecovery]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Bryce Covert and Mike Konczal <a href="http://www.good.is/post/the-real-explanation-for-the-womancession/" target="_self">point out</a> that men &quot;have gained 805,000 jobs, but women have lost a total of 281,000&quot; since the recession ended. They break this down by occupation:</p> <blockquote> <p>Women have been brutally hit when it comes to a category called “office and administrative support occupations,&quot; i.e. those who make workplaces run smoothly. In this occupation, which represents over 17 million workers, women have lost a total of 925,000 jobs while men have gained 204,000 since the recession ended. Looking into quarterly data for the individual job categories that make up this sector, it&#39;s clear that there have been extensive job losses among administrative assistants, secretaries, and others who support their offices</p> </blockquote> <p>Konczal <a href="http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/new-article-at-good-magazine-research-note-about-occupations-the-gendered-recovery-and-the-great-speedup/" target="_self">follows up</a> at his blog. Noreen Malone <a href="http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/mancession-2011-8/" target="_self">explains</a> how males have bounced back:</p>]]></html></oembed>