<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Conservatives vs Econ&nbsp;101]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Reacting to <a href="http://www.digital-dd.com/the-growth-of-the-internet-and-the-happy-recession/" target="_self">Byrne Hobart</a>, Noah Smith <a href="http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/supply-side-vs-demand-side-recessions.html" target="_self">notices</a> that conservative diagnoses of the recession wouldn&#39;t pass a basic Economics class:</p> <blockquote> <p>In  all of the recent recessions, faltering output has been accompanied by  lower, or even negative, inflation. This means that demand shocks must  have been the culprit. If &quot;uncertainty about government policy&quot; were  really the cause of the recession, as <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703278604574624711732528426.html">many conservatives claim</a>,  then we would have seen prices rise - as companies grew less willing to  make the stuff that people wanted, stuff would become more scarce, and  people would bid up the prices (dipping into their savings to do so).  I.e, we would have seen inflation. But we didn&#39;t see inflation.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>