<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Will The GOP Flake Out On Entitlement&nbsp;Reform?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><img alt="Mandatory-discretionary-spending-600" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451c45669e2015434cc6639970c" src="https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/6a00d83451c45669e2015434cc6639970c-550wi.jpg" style="width: 515px;" title="Mandatory-discretionary-spending-600" /> <br /><span style="font-size: 8pt;"><em>by Maisie Allison</em></span></p>
<p>Byron York <a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/york-spending-not-entitlements-created-deficits" target="_self">previews</a> the GOP&#39;s (misleading) talking points on the deficit:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The bottom line is that with baby boomers aging, entitlements will one day be a major budget problem. But today&#39;s deficit crisis is not one of entitlements. It was created by out-of-control spending on everything&#0160;<em>other</em>&#0160;than entitlements. The recent debt-ceiling agreement is supposed to put the brakes on that kind of spending, but leaders have so far been maddeningly vague on how they&#39;ll do it.&#0160;Should Republicans base their platform on entitlement reform, or should they focus on the here and now &#8212; specifically, on undoing the damage done by Obama and his Democratic allies? In coming months, the answer will likely become clear: entitlements someday, but first things first.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>His colleague Conn Carroll <a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/entitlement-spending-creating-deficits-now" target="_self">pounces</a>, arguing that entitlement reform should be at the forefront of the Republican platform in 2012. Another colleague Philip Klein <a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/yes-entitlements-are-main-problem" target="_self">sides</a> with Carroll. York <a href="http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/response-conn-carroll" target="_self">responds</a>. Yuval Levin <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/275480/re-examining-entitlements-yuval-levin" target="_self">complicates</a> York&#39;s false choice, and concludes that it is &quot;absolutely essential that the Republican presidential candidate next year is willing to make a case for some real reforms.&quot; Noting that it &quot;certainly would be a mistake to duck the issue,&quot;&#0160;Jennifer Rubin <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/free-advice-to-republican-candidates-on-entitlements/2011/03/29/gIQAXRKMbJ_blog.html" target="_self">leaves</a> the question to her readers.&#0160;</p>
<p>(Chart: <a href="http://www.heritage.org/budgetchartbook/mandatory-discretionary-spending" target="_self">Heritage Foundation</a>, via Carroll)</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://sullydish.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/6a00d83451c45669e2015434cc6639970c-550wi.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[368]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>