<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Internet Won&#8217;t Kill&nbsp;Cities]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Timothy B Lee <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2011/09/26/density-limits-are-urban-protectionism/" target="_self">compares</a> urban density to free trade:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[O]nline communication isn’t a good substitute for face-to-face  interaction. We’re both happier and more productive when we’re  interacting with other people in person. And so high-density development  patterns have the same kind of productivity-enhancing benefits that  free trade does. Tall buildings, walkable neighborhoods, and a good  transit system reduce the average cost of face-to-face interaction in  exactly the same way that steam ships and low tariffs reduced the  average costs of shipping goods to the other side of the world. In both  cases, the result is greater wealth, on a per-capita basis.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>