<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The FAA Bans Tech During Takeoff Because&nbsp;&#8230;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>There&#39;s no evidence&#0160;[<a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/disruptions-fliers-must-turn-off-devices-but-its-not-clear-why/" target="_self">NYT</a>] that it <em>can&#39;t </em>crash the plane. Aviation-wonk Jim Fallows <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/all-electronic-devices-must-now-be-powered-off-but-why/249184/" target="_self">points out</a> that pilots regularly use technology passengers are made to power off. The only defense of the regulation he can muster:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[H]ere is the only, admittedly weak rationale behind the &quot;turn all equipment off&quot; diktat. If anything went wrong on a crowded airline flight, the flight crew would need everyone&#39;s full attention,&#0160;<em>now</em>. The prevailing theory is that passengers are less likely to be distracted if they&#39;re not cocooned by their acoustic headsets or distracted by their iPads.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Follow-up <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/11/why-you-cant-read-a-kindle-during-take-off-4-theories/249197/" target="_self">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>