<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A Left-Handed Goodbye]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>In reviewing Rik Smits&#39; <em>T</em><em>he Puzzle of Left-handedness,</em>&#0160;David Yourdon <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/post/13872378424/southpaw-grammar" target="_self">examines</a> an especially creepy theory:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Not only is left-handedness twice as common among twins as among regular siblings, but left-handers are twice as likely as right-handers to produce twins. This eerie link lies at the heart of another modern theory (and Smits’s favorite): that &quot;being a monozygotic twin is a precondition of being left-handed.&quot; In other words, only someone who has had a twin in utero can be truly left-handed. The twins are mirror images of one another; one is left-handed, and the other right-handed. Of course, left-handedness doesn’t require that one ultimately be born with a twin. If only one fetus results at the end of term, that means the other died in the womb and was absorbed by the mother: a &quot;vanishing twin.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>