<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Santorum&#8217;s Dumb Luck]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Ezra Klein&#0160;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/was-rick-santorum-good-or-was-he-lucky/2011/08/25/gIQAzQFcaP_blog.html?wprss=ezra-klein" target="_self">believes</a>&#0160;that the candidate&#39;s surge says very little about him:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Santorum’s finish doesn’t say much about his ideology, or his campaign skills, or his endorsements. Quite the opposite, in fact. In a race where a large number of anti-Romney voters were desperate to find a candidate, Santorum was unable to attract significant support until the very end, when the anti-Romney vote literally had nowhere else to go. If he had been a better candidate, he would have crested earlier.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That&#39;s a bit dismissive of Santorum&#39;s dogged, old-school, truck-based campaign, which, to my mind, was exemplary and deserves praise. Ditto Santorum&#39;s &quot;concession&quot; speech: moving and smart, compared with Romney&#39;s deranged recitation of &quot;America The Beautiful&quot;. But I suspect Ezra&#39;s right. In this game of musical chairs, if the music had stopped earlier, the nod would have gone to Newt or Ron. But that&#39;s politics. Timing is everything.</p>
]]></html></oembed>