<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What Gingrich Can Win By&nbsp;Losing]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p><em><span style="font-size: 8pt;">by Patrick Appel</span></em></p>
<p>Frum <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/06/opinion/frum-gingrich-romney/index.html?hpt=op_t1" target="_self">advises</a> Newt to drop out and hope for a Romney defeat:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If the GOP were to lose in 2012, the next cycle could be the most wide open since 1940. There would be no &quot;runner-up&quot; to claim the nomination next time, the way Romney claimed it in 2012 or John McCain in 2008 or Bob Dole in 1996 or George H.W .Bush in 1988.&#0160;But a Gingrich who had won some primaries as a conservative alternative to Romney &#8212; something neither Rick Perry nor Sarah Palin nor, by the way, Ron Paul or Rick Santorum will have done &#8212; could plausibly claim leadership of the conservative wing of the Republican Party. Such a Gingrich could then credibly demand kowtowing and ring-kissing from everyone entering the huge 2016 field, especially since, by that point a year older than McCain was in 2008, he&#39;d have difficulty mobilizing support for a second run of his own.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>