<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Romney-Santorum 2012?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s what Frum <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/davidfrum/status/179918934257053696" target="_self">suggests</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/davidfrum/status/179918989449895936" target="_self">would happen</a> if Santorum racks up enough delegates. Scott Galupo <a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/scott-galupo/2012/03/15/dont-hold-your-breath-for-a-romney-santorum-ticket" target="_self">counters</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>I realize that&#0160;<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/20/biden-obamas-inexperience-will-prompt-nations-to-test-us/">Vice President Joe Biden said</a>&#0160;that then-Sen. Barack Obama lacked experience (and that he said this during both the primary and, amazingly, the general-election campaign). But it seems to me that there&#39;s a substantial difference between Biden characterizing Obama as brilliant but green, and Santorum bluntly proclaiming Romney &quot;disqualified&quot; due to &#0160;ideological heresy. The former arguably comes from a place of fundamental sympathy, while the latter is hostile and unappeasable.</p> </blockquote> <p>Paul Waldman <a href="http://prospect.org/article/horns-mitts-dilemma" target="_self">sees</a> the choice as part of a broader VP problem for Romney:</p>]]></html></oembed>