<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Twin Myths On&nbsp;Israel]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6W73v4p6Yyg" width="515"></iframe></p> <p><em><span style="font-size: 8pt;">by Zack Beauchamp</span></em></p> <p>An excellent piece&#0160;by Yair Rosenberg over at <em>Tablet</em> <a href="http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/96492/the-most-anti-israel-president/?all=1" target="_self">debunks</a>&#0160;a pair of big ones. First, Obama has been significantly less harsh on Israel than...his GOP predecessors:</p> <blockquote> <p>Reagan was not the only president willing to put daylight between the United States and Israel. His successor, George H.W. Bush, made waves at a 1990 news conference when he&#0160;<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=6TheOPfVb44C&amp;pg=PA133&amp;lpg=PA133&amp;dq=My+position+is+that+the+foreign+policy+of+the+United+States+says+we+do+not+believe+there+should+be+new+settlements+in+the+West+Bank+or+in+East+Jerusalem&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=hPl1CXjXny&amp;sig=22qUO_">said</a>, “My position is that the foreign policy of the United States says we do not believe there should be new settlements in the West Bank or in East Jerusalem.” It was a statement that could just as easily have been made by President Obama. But unlike Obama, Bush took this controversial position a step further,&#0160;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/09/07/world/israel-ignoring-bush-presses-for-loan-guarantees.html?pagewanted=all&amp;src=pm">conditioning</a>&#0160;$10 billion of loan guarantees to Israel on a total cessation of settlement building. He later compromised and allowed the loans to go forward, but with deductions commensurate with Israel’s construction in the occupied territories.</p> </blockquote> <p>Second, Netanyahu is significantly less right-wing Israeli than his Likud predecessors:</p>]]></html></oembed>