<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ovums On Demand]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Virginia Hughes <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21428601.500-ovary-banks-freezing-the-biological-clock.html?" target="_self">reports</a> on an experimental new procedure:</p> <blockquote> <p>In the 1970s, fertility treatments such as egg freezing emerged as a way to extend the upper limit of the childbearing years. But these came&#0160;<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17022975.100-stop-the-clock.html">with caveats of their own</a>. [For one patient] egg freezing would have required two weeks of hormone pills and injections, and frequent ultrasounds to monitor the ripening eggs - a regime that can cause mood swings and didn&#39;t fit into her gruelling work schedule. And each of these expensive, time-consuming, hormone-heavy cycles would only yield around 12 eggs.&#0160;By contrast, if you bank ovarian tissue, you can theoretically preserve thousands of eggs after one short laparoscopic surgery.</p> </blockquote> <p>In a follow-up post, Hughes <a href="http://www.lastwordonnothing.com/2012/04/24/tick-tock/" target="_self">doubts</a> whether the procedure would really be a panacea:</p> <blockquote> <p>If we had a technology that could stop the clock, would a bunch of Good Things happen to women?</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>