<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A Necessary Tolerance]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Historian&#0160;Martin Marty&#0160;<a href="http://www.newberry.org/martin-marty-and-american-pluralism-interview" target="_self">describes</a> what has driven his fascination with American religious pluralism:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>New York Congressman John Canfield Spencer, soon after the nation’s  founding, noted “the extreme division of sects [which is almost without  limits].” If there were one religion, as throughout history elsewhere,  he wrote, it would persecute dissenters. “If there were but two  religions, we should cut each others’ throats. But no sect having the  majority, all have need of tolerance.” James Madison argued that the  security for civil and religious rights consisted “in the multiplicity  of sects… .” So it has been. That takes care of that, in the American  agenda. But&#0160;people do not live by mere “diversity”&#0160;or “tolerance”&#0160;or  “multiplicity.” Citizens have&#0160;lives to live, deaths to fear,&#0160;sacrifices  to make, acts of love and justice to exercise, truths to seek. These are  often and perhaps usually related to our ultimate concern, which for  most is mediated through religious communities and texts.&#0160;Figuring out  how to live with both “the many” and “the one” by telling stories has  struck me as a worthwhile life’s work.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>