<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Quote For The&nbsp;Day]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>&quot;To the several Times readers who objected to my offhanded description of  the French philosopher Michel Foucault as &#39;creepy,&#39; a point of  clarification. Foucault was indeed an influential thinker. His  ruminations on power have launched thousands of undergraduate term  papers, and my heart goes out to the professors who have to read them.  The adjective in question was meant to refer specifically to his  enthusiasm for the theory and practice of sadomasochism. According to  James Miller’s adoring biography, Foucault himself wrote of his delight  in &#39;the overwhelming, the unspeakable…the stupefying, the ecstatic&#39; –  and &#39;the creepy,&#39;&quot; &#8211; <a href="http://keller.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/catholics-continued/" target="_self">Bill Keller</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>