<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Single In The&nbsp;City]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><iframe frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3RDnUUfgf0o" width="515"></iframe></p> <p>Amanda Hess <a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/arts-and-lifestyle/2012/06/your-city-keeping-you-single/2417/" target="_self">questions</a> the assumption that cities like Los Angeles and New York are great for dating:</p> <blockquote> <p>A closer look at the studies shows that they’re often measuring the best cities for single people to stay that way—depending on your perspective, the&#0160;<em>worst&#0160;</em>cities for singles. In New York, <a href="http://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/best-cities-for-singles/2.html"><em>Kiplinger</em>’s 2012 count notes</a>, over half of the metro area’s 18.7 million households are unmarried ones (the&#0160;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/27/AR2009102702019_2.html?sid=ST2009102800024">national average is 28 percent</a>), and one in five people fall between the ages of 20 and 34. Of the Los Angeles metro’s 12.7 million people, 54 percent of households aren’t hitched. <em>... </em><em>Forbes</em> and <em>Kiplinger</em> present volume of daters as a positive, but <a href="http://matchatter.blogspot.com/2010/12/retail-better-choosing-experience.html">the research of Sheena Iyengar suggests otherwise</a>.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>