<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[No Repeal Without&nbsp;Replace]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>Josh Barro <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-06/make-repeal-contingent-on-replace-.html">suggests</a>&#0160;a new strategy for conservative healthcare wonks:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Is Obamacare really so bad that we&#39;re better off with no reform at all? That&#39;s a tough case to make &#8212; much tougher than the case that some theoretical reform is superior to Obamacare. It involves contending that the health-care law is so unacceptably damaging that it&#39;s worth leaving 30 million Americans without insurance to get rid of it.</p>
<p>And if conservative health wonks can&#39;t make that case, they should go on to say that repealing the health care law should be contingent on passing a suitable alternative plan to replace it. That would put more pressure on Republican lawmakers to be serious about replacement, and make a conservative health reform more likely.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></html></oembed>