<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[&#8220;Faith Is Like Being In&nbsp;Love&#8221;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[
<p>In researching his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0871404095/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=slatmaga-20&amp;camp=0&amp;creative=0&amp;linkCode=as4&amp;creativeASIN=0871404095&amp;adid=0N7ZMNQ4XDCS0P4T5T52" target="_self"><em>Why Does the World Exist?</em></a>, Jim Holt discussed the book&#39;s central question with the novelist John Updike, an idiosyncratic Christian who claimed Pascal, Kierkegaard, and Karl Barth as heroes. Updike viewed existence as a &quot;permanent mystery,&quot; and <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2012/07/jim_holt_s_why_does_the_world_exist_the_author_and_john_updike_talk_about_the_universe_.single.html" target="_self">described</a> his faith this way:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Updike paused for a moment or two, then said, “I was once asked to be on a radio program called <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99919409" target="_blank"><em>This I Believe</em></a>.  As a fiction writer, I really don’t like to formulate what I believe  because, like a quantum phenomenon, it varies from day to day, and  anyway there’s a sort of bad luck attached to expressing yourself too  clearly. On this radio program I conceded that ruling out natural  theology does leave too much of humanity and human experience behind. I  suppose even a hardened Barthian might cling to at least one piece of  natural theology, Christ’s saying, ‘By their fruits shall ye know  them’—that so much of what we construe as virtue and heroism seems to  come from faith. But to make faith into an abstract scientific  proposition is to please no one, least of all the believers. There’s no  intellectual exertion in accepting it. Faith is like being in love. As  Barth put it, God is reached by the shortest ladder, not by the longest  ladder. Barth’s constant point was that it is God’s movement that  bridges the distance, not human effort.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Watch the Dish&#39;s first installment of &quot;Ask Jim Holt Anything&quot; <a href="http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2012/07/ask-jim-holt-anything-why-is-there-something-rather-than-nothing.html" target="_self">here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>