<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Dish]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://dish.andrewsullivan.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://dish.andrewsullivan.com/author/sullydish/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Mason Jars And Marriage&nbsp;Equality]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.theonion.com/video_embed/?id=28925" width="515"></iframe></p> <p>Straight couples <a href="http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/goodridge-same-sex-marriage-2012-8/" target="_self">are turning</a> to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ­decision legalizing gay marriage<em> </em>as philosophical inspiration for their own secular weddings<em>:<br /></em></p> <blockquote> <p>With a little deft editing, respecting both the listener’s patience and  the layperson’s general disinterest in legal footnotes, a bride- or  groom-to-be could stitch together some of [Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall]’s most elegant  observations into an affirmative case for marriage that even the  ­Westboro Baptist Church would not protest. As support for gay marriage  increased, that softer packaging of [<em>Goodridge</em> v. <em>Department of Public Health]</em>—and the universal themes it advances—found a foothold in the weddings canon.</p> </blockquote>]]></html></oembed>